ISSUE - Norway - Project on Missionary Activity and Human Rights

 

THE TANDEM PROJECT

www.tandemproject.com.  

 

UNITED NATIONS, HUMAN RIGHTS,

FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF

 

THE OSLO COALITION ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF

PROJECT ON MISSIONARY ACTIVITIES AND HUMAN RIGHTS

 

Issue:  Missionary Activity and Human Rights: a project on resolution of conflicts arising from missionary activities.

 

For: United Nations, Governments, Religions or Beliefs, Academia, NGOs, Media, Civil Society

 

Release: The Oslo Coalition Project on Missionary Activity and Human Rights is an outstanding example of how to use International Human Rights Standards on Freedom of Religion or Belief. A common code of conduct for missionary activities has been drafted and a conference on this draft will be held in Oslo on 25-26 November, 2008. According to the Oslo Coalition, “The aim of this project is to contribute, on the basis of human rights, to the resolution of conflicts arising from missionary activities.”

 

The Tandem Project encourages this common code of conduct to resolve conflicts arising from missionary activities be considered as an example of International Human Rights Standards on Freedom of Religion or Belief in consultations with the Norwegian government for the National Report on their Universal Periodic Review in 2009.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Link to the Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief Project on Missionary Activities and Human Rights Background Document:

 

http://www.oslocoalition.org/mhr_background_eng.php

 

http://www.oslocoalition.org/mhr.php

______________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Excerpts: Excerpts are presented under the Eight Articles of the 1981 U.N. Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief. Examples of extracts are presented prior to an Issue Statement for each Review.  

 

1. 1 Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have a religion or whatever belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practices and teaching.

 

6.1 In accordance with Article 1 of the present Declaration, and subject to the provisions of Article 1, paragraph 3, the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief shall include, inter alia, the following freedoms:

 

6. 4 To write issue and disseminate relevant publications in these areas;

 

6. 5 To teach a religion or belief in places suitable for these purposes;

“The right to engage in faith persuasion

The right to engage in faith persuasion as a part of the right to manifest one's religion or belief

The right to engage in faith persuasion is not explicitly mentioned in art. 18. However, this will normally be a part of the “manifestation” of a belief, cf. para. 1 of the article – as “teaching” or as “practice”, the latter covering all thinkable forms of manifestations that are not explicitly mentioned in the article.[5] In some religions, the believers are urged by the religious doctrines to try to spread the faith. And for all beliefs, as long as the believer is strongly convinced, he or she will have a natural wish to try to convince others of the “truth” - if the “truth” is decisive for an afterlife as well, this wish may be strong.­­ Even if not being an integral part of a religion's or belief's dogmas, such kind of faith persuasion is covered by the phrase “manifestation”.

Falling within the ambit of art. 18 (1), the state may not interfere in proselytism activities without this being legitimate after para. 3 of the article (the “negative obligation”), cf. para. 6 below. Furthermore, the state has a “positive obligation”, to “ensure” the right: [6] The state is obliged to give its citizens protection against clear violations from other citizens who do not respect this right. Thus, the state may be obliged to protect an adherent of a minority belief, trying to convince a member of the majority religion, against harassment from the majority.

The right to engage in faith persuasion is not explicitly mentioned in art. 18. However, this will normally be a part of the “manifestation” of a belief, cf. para. 1 of the article – as “teaching” or as “practice”, the latter covering all thinkable forms of manifestations that are not explicitly mentioned in the article.[5] In some religions, the believers are urged by the religious doctrines to try to spread the faith. And for all beliefs, as long as the believer is strongly convinced, he or she will have a natural wish to try to convince others of the “truth” - if the “truth” is decisive for an afterlife as well, this wish may be strong.­­ Even if not being an integral part of a religion's or belief's dogmas, such kind of faith persuasion is covered by the phrase “manifestation”.

1. The sources of the international freedom of religion or belief

The most important international legislation on the freedom of religion or belief, is art. 18 in the United Nation's International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR), from 1966. CCPR art. 18 is built upon art. 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (DHR), from 1948.[1]

Some important issues regarding discrimination are treated in the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief (1981).

Freedom of religion or belief is also protected by some regional instruments, like the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) art. 9 and the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR) art. 12.

About 160 states have ratified CCPR, and the freedom of religion or belief has generally a wide recognition. Thus, there are good reasons for stating that the basic elements of the freedom of religion or belief as expressed in art. 18, are international customary law. This means that the states are legally obliged to respect this freedom, regardless of the ratification status of the different conventions.

Some parts of the text of CCPR art. 18 are vague. To be able to get a closer understanding of CCPR art. 18, the UN Human Rights Committee has delivered a General Comment on this freedom (General Comment no. 22, from 1993). In addition, the Human Rights Committee may, for those states that have accepted this opportunity, decide individual complaints.[2] The Committee has not till this date decided cases on proselytism. Yet, a couple of cases on proselytism have been decided by the European Court of Human Rights. Because of the almost similar wording of ECHR art. 9 and CCPR art. 18, the jurisprudence of the European Court is of relevance regarding CCPR art. 18 as well.

ISSUE STATEMENT: The U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Asma Jahangir, in her report to the United Nations General Assembly, (A/61/340), paragraph 61, is cautious on legislation regarding Conversion and Propagation of Religion, “Legislation may not always be the appropriate response, in particular in circumstances involving matters of faith. While legislation can be easily resorted to it can sometimes be counterproductive to do so.” The Special Rapporteur in her 2006 report recommended: “inter-religious communities should give serious consideration to developing an agreed code of ethics in pursuit of their missionary work.”

 

The Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief is doing this with the Project on Missionary Activity and Human Rights, A common code of conduct for missionary activities has been drafted and a conference on this draft will be held in Oslo on 25-26 November, 2008. “The aim of this project is to contribute, on the basis of human rights, to the resolution of conflicts arising from missionary activities.”

 

A second effort underway to create a common code of conduct for religious conversions is being drafted by the Vatican, World Council of Churches and World Evangelical Alliance. According to an Associated Press Release, the code will be ready by 2010 and should be “an advocacy tool in discussions with governments considering anti-conversion laws, and help advance the cause of religious freedom. “Evangelical Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Orthodox: Join in Creating Common Code of Conduct for Religious Conversions” (Word Document attached). 

 

International Human Rights Standards on Freedom of Religion or Belief are international law and a universal code of conduct for peaceful cooperation, respectful competition and resolution of conflicts. These standards can be a platform for genuine dialogue on core principles and values within and among nations, all religions and other beliefs.

 

Inter-religious, inter-cultural dialogues focus on fundamental values shared virtually universally by public, private, religious and non-religious organizations to change how our cultures view differences, how we often behave toward one another and to forestall the reflexive hostility we see so vividly around the world.

 

Surely one of the best hope’s for humankind is to embrace a culture in which religions and other beliefs accept one another, in which wars and violence are not tolerated in the name of an exclusive right to truth, in which children are raised to solve conflicts with mediation, compassion and understanding.

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

STANDARDS: http://www.tandemproject.com/program/81_dec.htm

 

Submit information under the Eight Articles and sub-paragraphs of the 1981 U.N. Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief in The Tandem Project Country & Community Database.

 

http://www.tandemproject.com/databases/forms/card.htm

 

The Tandem Project: a non-governmental organization founded in 1986 to build understanding, tolerance and respect for diversity, and to prevent discrimination in matters relating to freedom of religion or belief. The Tandem Project, a non-profit NGO, has sponsored multiple conferences, curricula, reference materials and programs on Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion - and 1981 United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief.

 

The Tandem Project initiative is the result of a co-founder representing the World Federation of United Nations Associations at the United Nations Geneva Seminar, Encouragement of Understanding, Tolerance and Respect in Matters Relating to Freedom of Religion or Belief, called by the UN Secretariat in 1984 on ways to implement the 1981 UN Declaration. In 1986, The Tandem Project organized the first NGO International Conference on the 1981 UN Declaration.

 

The Tandem Project Executive Director is: Michael M. Roan, mroan@tandemproject.com. 

 

The Tandem Project is a UN NGO in Special Consultative Status with the

Economic and Social Council of the United Nations

_________________________________________

 

Postscript: considers the objective, challenge and question of a Convention on Freedom of Religion or Belief followed by a response from the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief. The Tandem Project proposes a concept, Separation of Religion or Belief and State (SOROBAS) as an option for consideration. SOROBAS complements the core principles and values of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights through rights-based Dialogue and Education. 

 

Objective: Build understanding and support for Article 18, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights –Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion - and the 1981 UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief. Encourage the United Nations, Governments, Religions or Beliefs, Academia, NGOs, Media and Civil Society to consider the rule of law and International Human Rights Standards on Freedom of Religion or Belief as essential for long-term solutions to conflicts in matters relating to religion or belief.

 

Challenge: In 1968 the United Nations deferred work on an International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Religious Intolerance, because of its apparent complexity and sensitivity. In the twenty-first century, a dramatic increase of intolerance and discrimination on grounds of religion or belief is motivating a worldwide search to find solutions to these problems. This is a challenge calling for enhanced dialogue by States and others; including consideration of an International Convention on Freedom of Religion or Belief for protection of and accountability by all religions or beliefs. The tensions in today’s world inspire a question such as:

 

Should the United Nations adopt an International Convention on Freedom of Religion or Belief?

 

Response: Is it the appropriate moment to reinitiate the drafting of a legally binding international convention on freedom of religion or belief? Law making of this nature requires a minimum consensus and an environment that appeals to reason rather than emotions. At the same time we are on a learning curve as the various dimensions of the Declaration are being explored. Many academics have produced voluminous books on these questions but more ground has to be prepared before setting up of a UN working group on drafting a convention. In my opinion, we should not try to rush the elaboration of a Convention on Freedom of Religion or Belief, especially not in times of high tensions and unpreparedness. - UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Asma Jahangir, Prague 25 Year Anniversary Commemoration of the 1981 UN Declaration, 25 November 2006.

 

Option: After forty years this may be the time, however complex and sensitive, for the United Nations Human Rights Council to appoint an Open-ended Working Group to draft a United Nations Convention on Freedom of Religion or Belief. The mandate for an Open-ended Working Group ought to assure nothing in a draft Convention will be construed as restricting or derogating from any right defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenants on Human Rights, and the 1981 UN Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief.

 

Concept: Separation of Religion or Belief and State – SOROBAS. The First Preamble to the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights; “Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world. This concept suggests States recalling their history, culture and constitution adopt fair and equal human rights protection for all religions or beliefs as described in General Comment 22 on Article 18, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, UN Human Rights Committee, 20 July 1993 (CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4):

 

Article 18: protects theistic, non-theistic and atheistic beliefs, as well as the right not to profess any religion or belief. The terms belief and religion are to be broadly construed. Article 18 is not limited in its application to traditional religions or to religions and beliefs with international characteristics or practices analogous to those of traditional religions. The Committee therefore views with concern any tendency to discriminate against any religion or belief for any reasons, including the fact that they are newly established, or represent religious minorities that may be the subject of hostility by a predominant religious community. Article 18: permits restrictions to manifest a religion or belief only if such limitations are prescribed by law and necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.

 

 Separation of Religion or Belief and State

 

The Tandem Project Concept, Separation of Religion or Belief and State (SOROBAS) supports the U.N. Human Rights Council in their responsibility to monitor implementation of the 1981 U.N. Declaration on the Elimination of all Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief. The Tandem Project using international human rights law reviews the actions of governments and civil society living under separation of church and state, state church, theocratic or other legal frameworks. The concept is equal and fair protection for all theistic, non-theistic and atheistic beliefs, as well as the right not to profess any religion or belief in tandem with the rule of law and international human rights standards on freedom of religion or belief.

 

Inter-religious, inter-cultural dialogues focus on fundamental values shared virtually universally by public, private, religious and non-religious organizations to change how our cultures views differences, how we often behave toward one another and to forestall the reflexive hostility we see so vividly around the world. Surely one of the best hopes for the future of humankind is to embrace a culture in which religions and other beliefs accept one another, in which wars and violence are not tolerated in the name of an exclusive right to truth, in which children are raised to solve conflicts with mediation, compassion and understanding.

 

Dialogue & Education

 

Dialogue: United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, at the Alliance of Civilizations Madrid Forum said; “Never in our lifetime has there been a more desperate need for constructive and committed dialogue, among individuals, among communities, among cultures, among and between nations.” A writer in another setting has said, “The warning signs are clear: unless we establish genuine dialogue within and among all kinds of belief, ranging from religious fundamentalism to secular dogmatism, the conflicts of the future will probably be even more deadly.”

 

International Human Rights Standards on Freedom of Religion or Belief are international law and universal code of conduct for peaceful cooperation, respectful competition and resolution of conflicts. The standards are a platform for genuine dialogue on core principles and values within and among nations, all religions and other beliefs.

 

Education: Ambassador Piet de Klerk addressing the Prague 25 Year Anniversary Commemoration of the 1981 U.N. Declaration said; “Our educational systems need to provide children with a broad orientation: from the very beginning, children should be taught that their own religion is one out of many and that it is a personal choice for everyone to adhere to the religion or belief by which he or she feels most inspired, or to adhere to no religion or belief at all.”

 

The 1981 U.N. Declaration states; “Every child shall enjoy the right to have access to education in the matter of religion or belief in accordance with the wishes of his parents, and shall not be compelled to receive teaching on religion or belief against the wishes of his parents, the best interests of the child being the guiding principle.” With International Human Rights safeguards, early childhood education is the best time to begin to teach tolerance, understanding and respect for freedom of religion or belief.

 

Documents Attached:

 

Norway - Project on Missionary Activity and Human Rights

Common Codes of Christian Conduct for Religous Conversions